One reviewer model is not enough.
Build your own reviewer personas.
Performance Reviewer with GPT-5-mini for speed. Security Reviewer with GPT-5-pro for paranoia. A11y Reviewer with a tight WCAG 2.2 prompt. Each persona, each model, each cost — your call.
Frequently asked
Does Agentopia by CynetIQ do PR comment threading like CodeRabbit?
Agentopia by CynetIQ writes the structured review (Summary, Findings, Severity, Score) into the PR description and posts a comment with the per-finding breakdown. We do not yet thread per-line comments inline on the diff (on the roadmap). For now, each finding cites file:line so reviewers can click through.
Can I run different reviewers on different repos?
Yes — the reviewer agent is picked per task / per Integration Rule. You can have a Performance Reviewer fire on backend repos and an A11y Reviewer fire on frontend repos, with a single security_developer agent gating all security-tagged tasks.
How does cost compare?
Agentopia by CynetIQ is BYO LLM, so the variable cost is whatever your provider charges per review. A typical review on GPT-5-mini is $0.01-0.05; on GPT-5 it’s $0.15-0.40. CodeRabbit at $24/dev/mo for unlimited reviews is competitive at high review volume; Agentopia by CynetIQ wins at lower volume or when you want to control which model runs.
Is the security reviewer really OWASP-aware?
The system prompt explicitly enumerates the OWASP Top 10 (A01-A10) and asks the model to map each finding to the relevant category. It’s tuned to be paranoid — treats every input as malicious, traces data flow, and outputs threat model + fix plan + residual risk. You can edit the prompt in [Prompt Studio](/dashboard/prompts) and roll back to previous versions if a tweak degrades quality.
