Agentopia by CynetIQ vs CodeRabbit

One reviewer model is not enough.
Build your own reviewer personas.

Performance Reviewer with GPT-5-mini for speed. Security Reviewer with GPT-5-pro for paranoia. A11y Reviewer with a tight WCAG 2.2 prompt. Each persona, each model, each cost — your call.

FeatureAgentopia by CynetIQCodeRabbit
Reviewer modelYou pick — GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, or your own endpoint per agent.Fixed CodeRabbit model. No choice.
Custom reviewer personasDefine any number — Performance, A11y, SQL Style Cop, Security. Each with its own prompt + model.Single reviewer with limited config.
OWASP-aware reviewerBuilt-in security_developer agent ships with paranoid OWASP Top 10 prompt.Generic review only.
Reporter / tag based routingIntegration Rules auto-route security tickets to the security reviewer, frontend tickets to the A11y reviewer, etc.No source-aware routing.
Source — auto-importSentry, Jira, Azure DevOps, New Relic, Datadog, AppDynamics — all reviewed automatically when imported as tasks.Triggered by PR open only.
Severity scoring0-100 confidence + critical/high/medium/low/clean severity per review.Comments only.
Per-agent audit historyEach reviewer agent has full review history with severity distribution and avg score.Org-level analytics, not per-persona.
Bring your own LLMYes — your OpenAI / Anthropic / Google key. Cost is yours, you control limits.CodeRabbit-hosted model, billed per review.
3D Agent Boss ModeWatch reviewer agents work in a live 3D office with real-time pipeline visibility.No visual agent orchestration.
PricingFree tier + BYO LLM. Pro at $49/mo per workspace.$15-30/dev/mo.

Frequently asked

Does Agentopia by CynetIQ do PR comment threading like CodeRabbit?

Agentopia by CynetIQ writes the structured review (Summary, Findings, Severity, Score) into the PR description and posts a comment with the per-finding breakdown. We do not yet thread per-line comments inline on the diff (on the roadmap). For now, each finding cites file:line so reviewers can click through.

Can I run different reviewers on different repos?

Yes — the reviewer agent is picked per task / per Integration Rule. You can have a Performance Reviewer fire on backend repos and an A11y Reviewer fire on frontend repos, with a single security_developer agent gating all security-tagged tasks.

How does cost compare?

Agentopia by CynetIQ is BYO LLM, so the variable cost is whatever your provider charges per review. A typical review on GPT-5-mini is $0.01-0.05; on GPT-5 it’s $0.15-0.40. CodeRabbit at $24/dev/mo for unlimited reviews is competitive at high review volume; Agentopia by CynetIQ wins at lower volume or when you want to control which model runs.

Is the security reviewer really OWASP-aware?

The system prompt explicitly enumerates the OWASP Top 10 (A01-A10) and asks the model to map each finding to the relevant category. It’s tuned to be paranoid — treats every input as malicious, traces data flow, and outputs threat model + fix plan + residual risk. You can edit the prompt in [Prompt Studio](/dashboard/prompts) and roll back to previous versions if a tweak degrades quality.

Related